April 16, 2024

Balkan Travellers

Comprehensive up-to-date news coverage, aggregated from sources all over the world

Kevin Spacey must pay $31 million in House of Cards shooting dispute - The Hollywood Reporter

Kevin Spacey must pay $31 million in House of Cards shooting dispute – The Hollywood Reporter

Kevin Spacey He lost his bid to overturn a $31 million arbitration award he had been ordered to pay house of paper MRC producer of sexual misconduct involving young crew members behind the scenes of the Netflix series.

Spacey was dropped from the Netflix series during its sixth season after allegations surfaced that he was preying on young adults. The dispute was sent to arbitration where it was an arbitrator It was found that the actor had broken his contract By violating anti-harassment policies and failing to provide services in a “professional manner”. The arbitrator also found that Spacey was ineligible to pay for the remainder of his contract, despite containing a pay-or-play clause, and that his violations caused the show’s sixth season to be shortened, rewritten, and cost eight-figure costs and revenue lost.

The Representative’s legal team responded by replying, Prize Challenge at a public hearing and claimed that she was “permeated with factual and legal errors – and most importantly, her finding that the MRC proved by the preponderance of the evidence that Spacey sexually harassed five ex-people [House of Cards] Crew members.” His attorneys argued that Spacey “engaged in a prolonged culture that was full of sexual innuendos, jokes, and innocent horse sentiment” but that he had not harassed anyone, and when he was told “his behavior made someone feel uncomfortable or unwanted in any way.” Shapes, stop. ”

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Mel Reed Ricana on Thursday confirmed the arbitration award and adopted a provisional ruling after hearing oral arguments.

“The arbitrator’s conclusion that the defendants’ breach caused the above damages is a factual finding that the court generally cannot review for fault,” Rikana explains in the judgment, which is published below. Furthermore, the court cannot review the adequacy of the evidence in support of the award. A panel of three arbitrators also confirmed the arbitrator’s final judgment in the proceedings under the JAMS Optional Arbitration Appeal Procedure.”

See also  Gwyneth Paltrow ski collision: When two skiers crash, who's at fault?

Rikana emphasized that in order to invalidate the arbitrator’s decision it had to be “completely illogical”, which is not the case here.

“We are pleased with the court’s ruling,” said Michael Coombe, the council’s attorney. THR.

MRC Co-owner The Hollywood Reporter Through a joint venture with Penske Media Corporation called PMRC.